<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>16 Multi-topic Issues</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2012:/multi//30</id>
   <updated>2012-01-25T02:13:11Z</updated>
   <subtitle>IMADR&apos;s primary focus is to combat racism, racial discrimination and multiple discrimination (in particular, discrimination based on both race and gender) as they cut across the areas below.</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 3.33</generator>

<entry>
   <title>E-CONNECT11 issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/subnews/econnect11_issued/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1170</id>
   
   <published>2011-12-16T07:59:38Z</published>
   <updated>2012-01-25T02:13:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="SubNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Voices of Minority Women at UN Minority Forum</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/mw/voices_of_minority_women_at_un/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1166</id>
   
   <published>2011-12-14T06:42:28Z</published>
   <updated>2012-01-25T02:12:07Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="02)Multiple discrimination against minority women in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
         <category term="SubNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[The 4th Forum on Minority Issues was held in Geneva on November 29 and 30, 2011. The session’s focus was “guaranteeing the rights of minority women,” with participants from around the world, including representatives of UN systems and mechanisms, member states and civil society organizations. Dalit women from India and Nepal also participated. The session’s agenda was as follows:

1. Adoption of the agenda and organization of work 
2. International and regional human rights frameworks and recent global initiatives relating to minority women's rights 
3. Minority women and girls and the right to education 
4. Minority women and effective political participation 
5. Minority women and effective participation in economic, social and cultural life 
6. National practices and experiences: positive measures/affirmative action and role models 
7. Concrete steps aimed at guaranteeing the rights of minority women 
8. Concluding remarks

Yuriko Moto, member of the IMADR-JC Planning Committee, participated in the session and delivered oral statements under agenda items 4 and 7 above, from the perspective of minority women in Japan, including Ainu, Okinawa, Buraku, Korean and migrant women. 

<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/Oral%20Statement%20on%20item%204.pdf">Oral Statement item 4</a>
<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/Oral%20Statement%20on%20item%207.pdf">Oral Statement item 7</a>

The draft recommendations adopted by the fourth session can be found <a href="http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/minority/session4.htm"targeet=_blank">here:</a>
<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/its%20concerns-minority%20woman.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.imadr.org/multi/its%20concerns-minority%20woman.html','popup','width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.imadr.org/multi/its%20concerns-minority%20woman-thumb.JPG" width="280" height="210" alt="" /></a>


]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>E-CONNECT No.10 Issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/subnews/econnect_no10_issued/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1142</id>
   
   <published>2011-10-07T08:30:24Z</published>
   <updated>2011-12-08T05:35:25Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="SubNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Okinawa is a Japanese Colony</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/policy/okinawa_is_a_japanese_colony/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1139</id>
   
   <published>2011-10-07T02:38:45Z</published>
   <updated>2011-11-28T07:51:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="03)Racism and Japanese public policy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[When CERD considered the Japanese government report during its 17th session in 2010, Okinawa was one of the issues most frequently focused on during the discussions. In its concluding observations, the Committee indicated its concern over the situation of Okinawa and included several recommendations to the government to address problems faced by Okinawan people. In this issue, we bring you an interesting essay about Okinawa by Dr. Yasukatsu Matsushima, Professor of Ryukoku University and the representative of civil group “Yuimarle Ryukyu no Jichi (autonomy of Ryukyu).” 


<b><Div Align="center">Okinawa is a Japanese Colony</b></Div>

<Div Align="right">Yasukatsu Matsushima 
(translated by Erika Kaneko)

From: “KAN”  Vol. 43, Autumn 2010</Div>


<u>We are not treated as equals</u>

My love for Okinawa is boundless. Okinawa is my <i>mabui</i> (spirit) and my body. I was born on the island of Ishigaki and grew up on the islands of South Daitô, Yonaguni and Okinawa, among the peoples, cultures and the seas of these islands.

It has become customary to use the name of the main island of the group, Okinawa, interchangeably and as representative of the whole Ryûkyû chain. In historical contexts, it stands for the independent Kingdom of Ryûkyû. We Ryûkyûans call ourselves <i>Uchinanchū</i> (we, us, ourselves) and the Japanese <i>Yamatunchū </i>(those from Yamato/ Japan). Even when I moved to Tôkyô to enter University and lived in a dormitory, I could not forget Okinawa. The contrary, my love grew even deeper. When the Yamatunchû asked, “Where do you come from?  What is your nationality?” and I replied, “I am from Okinawa”, they gazed at my face with puzzled curiosity. I repeatedly faced this kind of encounter, I had never before experienced in Okinawa.

Throughout my primary, middle and high school years, I had a Japanese education and spoke Japanese, although I am Okinawan. In 1972, when the USA “returned” Okinawa to Japanese administration, I was a third grader. At the time, I had an unforgettable experience. A teacher identified one of the students who had said something in our language by placing a “dialect label” around his neck and punishing him, because the school authorities were enforcing the rule that all speak Japanese. This was also customary in pre-war, (Second World War) contexts. I experienced with my body what it meant to be under Japanese rule. 

Although we are Japanese citizens, have a Japanese education and speak Japanese, the Japanese never acknowledge us as equals and treat us as foreigners. Among the Okinawans in the dormitory, some friends were so shocked by this treatment that they left school.  It was the Japanese who made me conscious of my complexion, facial features and language. I read and discussed with my friends the books written by the fathers of Ryûkyûan studies Iha Fuyû, Higashiona Kanjun and Yanagita Kunio, who espoused a thesis, alleging the cultural and historical identity of Japan and Ryûkyû - the so-called “same ancestor theory”. If we were one people and one culture, how do we explain the historical fact that Japan did unspeakable things to us?

An irresistible quest from the core of my being to solve questions, asking things such as,“What is the Okinawa issue ?” and ”Why Okinawa? ”, made me decide to enter the path of scholarship. My primary subjects were comparative studies of the Ryûkyû archipelago and other Pacific islands and island economies. I confirmed my view that all islands are equal in their mutual relationships and learn from each other. I am Okinawa! When Okinawa or Okinawans are appreciated, I am happy, and when they are discriminated against and insulted, I feel sad and angry.

This is not a sign of a shallow local patriotism, but an expression of our determination to prevent yet another period of colonization. Ever since the US military occupied Okinawa 56 years ago and turned administrative power over to Japan 38 years ago, the Japanese government and the Japanese people have turned a blind eye to threats to the lives and livelihoods of the Okinawan people and ignore the stabilization of this dire colonial situation. It can be said the Okinawa issue is a discrimination issue and I want to find a way to liberate us.

To continue, plase see the <a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/Okinawa%20is%20a%20Japanese%20Colony.pdf">PDF</a> file]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>IMADR’s Eighth General Assembly held in Tokyo</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/erd/imadrs_eighth_general_assembly/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1138</id>
   
   <published>2011-10-06T06:28:15Z</published>
   <updated>2011-12-14T06:27:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="01)Combating racial discrimination in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[Following the two-day board of directors meeting on September 11 and 12, 2011, IMADR’s quarterly General Assembly (GA) was held on the 13th in Tokyo with two hundred participants attending, mainly from Japan. It was approved by the GA that for the year beginning October 2011 to September 2012, IMADR will keep its focus on these key issues: 1) elimination of discrimination based on work and descent, 2) elimination of exploitative migration and trafficking in women and children, 3) upholding the rights of indigenous peoples, 4) upholding the rights of minorities including internally-displaced persons and Roma, 5) strengthening international human rights mechanisms and promoting their utilization by minority communities, and 6) crosscutting issues that include the elimination of racism and multiple forms of discrimination, and the human right to peace. 
 
Chaired by IMADR vice-president Kinhide Mushakoji, the GA welcomed brief presentations by its officers from different parts of the world. To begin with, IMADR and IMADR Asia Committee (AC) president Nimalka Fernando made a brief report about activities of the AC, which is based in Sri Lanka. With the cessation of the civil war in the country in 2009, some hundred thousand people in the conflict area were driven away from their homes to become so-called “internally displaced persons.” Among them, women and children are in the most vulnerable position, facing multiple forms of discrimination. AC focuses on the empowerment and training of these women to be human rights defenders. Also, the AC is much involved in the serious problem of exploitation and human rights violations imposed on many Sri Lankan migrant women working abroad. Among others, there is an immediate concern about a young woman who has been sentenced to death as a result of an unfair trial in Saudi Arabia, against which voices from the international community are necessary. 

Durga Sob, president of FEDO (Feminist Dalit Organization in Nepal) and IMADR director, talked about the situation of Dalit women in Nepal who face multiple forms of discrimination based on caste and gender. Because of this, Dalit women are subject to many forms of violence, bad health and sanitary conditions, and untouchability. Poverty is also one of the most serious problems for them. Their literacy rate is very low, and so is their life expectancy. The government is required to address the difficult situations of Dalit women by fully implementing its policies and programs designed for the vulnerable community. While it is welcomed that the drafting of a new constitution is underway at the Constitutional Assembly, the Assembly is not correctly represented by the minority community, i.e. the number of members from the Dalit community is lower than it should be. A lot of challenges are going on in Nepal, and Sob called for more attention to and support for the real cause of Dalit women. 

Bisi Olateru-Olagbegi, president of Women’s Consortium of Nigeria (WOCOM) and IMADR director, briefly talked about the issue of trafficking in women and children that WOCOM has mainly worked on. While trafficking is global phenomena, it is a daily occurrence in Nigeria. Millions of children from rural areas are transported to urban areas to work as domestic helpers, shop attendees, factory workers, prostitutes or beggars. Thousands of women and girls from Nigeria are sent to Italy, UK and Belgium to work as prostitutes. It is said that about 60% of African women working as prostitutes in Europe are from Nigeria. While in Europe, women are treated very badly. Root-causes of these problems rest with gender discrimination, poverty, globalization, racism and very strict laws in Europe. Impacts are enormous. WOCOM does a lot of advocacy work at the international level. Awareness-raising for people in the country is also one of important works of the organization. Because of ignorance, people are easily trapped, not knowing what their real situation is. Olateru-Olagbegi asked IMADR to support their work in awareness-building among the Nigerian people.

Herbert Heuss from the Central Council of German Sinti and Roma also made a brief presentation. This organization has worked with IMADR for 30 years. While the problem of exclusion and discrimination against Roma has been a long-term issue, it is getting worse in recent years in Europe along with the emergence of extreme rightists. For instance, in Slovakia and Czech, they typically throw fire bottles into places where Roma live, and shoot residents when they come out of the entrance to run away. The ideology of the extremists is deeply rooted into society. Even in France, the President takes advantage of the widespread propaganda of the extremists to drive Roma away from the country. Roma in Europe have diverse backgrounds. They are not one. For the past 20 years, unemployment has been rampant among Roma in Europe, with the unemployment rate as high as 90%. Their living conditions have remained the same as those of 50 years ago. In Hungary, a rightist group demonstrated in the village of Gygyspata and surrounded the Roma residential area. Together with IMADR, the organization sent a fact-finding mission to the village this year. The problem is very serious. Recently, the EU has requested each member state to develop national strategies to address the issue relating to Roma. We need to carefully follow up this process. Despite the existence of many policy papers and plans of action prepared by regional or national machineries in Europe, hardly any have been implemented. Decisive political will is needed.

The GA was concluded with the unanimous approval of all agendas presented by the board.

IMADR Board Member Map in the World
<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/IMADRBoardMemberMap%28%E8%8B%B1%29%E3%82%A2%E3%82%A6%E3%83%88%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%B3%E6%B8%881011small.pdf">Here(PDF File)</a>
You can also see from "about IMADR" page, right side Related Information.

<a href="https://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-count="none">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>
<br>
</br>
<iframe src="//www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=<$MTEntryPermalink$>&amp;send=false&amp;layout=standard&amp;width=70&amp;show_faces=false&amp;action=like&amp;colorscheme=light&amp;font=arial&amp;height=60" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:70px; height:60px;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Foundation of National Levelers Association and Levelers Declaration</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/erd/foundation_national_levelers_a/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1118</id>
   
   <published>2011-08-17T02:51:34Z</published>
   <updated>2011-10-18T09:25:36Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="01)Combating racial discrimination in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12" label="CategoryNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10" label="ThemeNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/Feature%20story.JPG"><img alt="Feature%20story.JPG" src="http://www.imadr.org/multi/Feature%20story-thumb.JPG" width="230" height="173" /></a>

On March 3, 1922, influenced by the Taisho* Democracy movement and calls for self-determination that had accompanied the Russian Revolution and the establishment of the League of Nations, the National Levelers Association (Zenkoku Suiheisha) was founded. The 

Levelers Declaration, adopted by the Founding Congress of the National Levelers Association, holds an esteemed position as Japan’s first “human rights declaration.” It states, “human beings are not to be pitied, but respected,” and calls for “light in all human beings.”

The Buraku Liberation League, as the organization’s successor, will celebrate the 90th anniversary of the National Levelers Association on March 3, 2012. To celebrate the 80th anniversary almost ten years ago, the Buraku Liberation and Human Rights Research Institute (BLHRRI) based in Osaka published a leaflet containing the full text of the Declaration in eight different languages, including contemporary Japanese, Chinese, English, French, Germany, Korean, Russian, Spanish and Ainu. The work took more than a year to complete, to carefully translate the text while preserving the spirit of the Declaration. The Declaration is inspiring for all who work for the elimination of discrimination and for the realization of human rights in the world today. 

The Declaration begins with the statement, <i>“Tokushu Burakumin throughout the Country Unite!”</i> Tokushu means “special,” referring to the fact that the Buraku community was different from others. The Japanese government deliberately used this word in a discriminatory manner. The Declaration continues:

<i>Long-suffering brothers! Over the past half-century, the movements on our behalf by so many people and in such varied ways have yielded no appreciable results. This failure is the punishment we have incurred for permitting ourselves as well as others to debase our own human dignity. Previous movements, though seemingly motivated by compassion, actually corrupted many of our brothers. Thus, it is imperative that we now organize a new collective movement to emancipate ourselves by promoting respect for human dignity.” 

Brothers! Our ancestors pursued and practiced freedom and equality. They were the victims of base, contemptible class policies and they were the manly martyrs of industry. As a reward for skinning animals, they were stripped of their own living flesh; in return for tearing out the hearts of animals, their own warm human hearts were ripped apart. They were even spat upon with ridicule. Yet, all through these cursed nightmares, their human pride ran deep in their blood. Now, the time has come when we human beings, pulsing with this blood, are soon to regain our divine dignity. The time has come for the victims to thrown off their stigma. The time has come for the blessing of the martyrs’ crown of thorns.

The time has come when we can be proud of being Eta**.

We must never again shame our ancestors and profane humanity through servile words and cowardly deeds. We, who know just how cold human society can be, who know what it is to be pitied, do fervently seek and adore the warmth and light of human life from deep within our hearts.

Thus is the Suiheisha born.

Let there be warmth in human society, let there be light in all human beings.

March 3, 1922
The Suiheisha</i>

**************
* Taisho is a name of the Japanese era from 1912 to 1926.
** Eta means “very filthy.” This derogatory term was given Buraku people during the Edo feudal era to place them outside the caste system. After the Meiji Restoration, the government issued an “Emancipation Edict” abolishing the outcaste status and the name “Eta.” The government gave them the name “new commoners” instead, and started to use the term “Tokushu Buraku” to refer to Buraku communities.

(Report by Megumi Komori, Under-Secretary-General, IMADR)]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>E-CONNECT No.8 Issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/subnews/econnect_no8_issued/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1104</id>
   
   <published>2011-07-08T07:26:30Z</published>
   <updated>2011-08-17T04:05:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="SubNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>“NO” to Discrimination</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/erd/no_to_discrimination/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1101</id>
   
   <published>2011-07-07T02:00:29Z</published>
   <updated>2011-08-17T04:04:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="01)Combating racial discrimination in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12" label="CategoryNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10" label="ThemeNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      The new civil society group called “Civil Action Committee Calling for the Enactment of a Law to Prohibit Discrimination” was officially launched on June 9, 2011. While Japan has a constitutional provision guaranteeing “equality” before the law for all people, it does not have any laws that criminalize discrimination. The Civil Action Committee has nine co-founders who are representatives of different minority communities, including Buraku, Ainu and people recovering from Hansen’s disease, human rights lawyers, an independent journalist, and researchers. The committee believes that the eradication of discrimination requires not only the implementation of legislation but also the education of people so that they fully support human rights as a rule of society, with slogans such as “No person harms another,” “Discrimination is illegal as a societal rule,” and “Nothing about us, without us!”  During the launch ceremony, the committee adopted the following appeal to express its concern over a new form of discrimination that has emerged against evacuees of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). 

******

“Fukushima Discrimination“ is emerging in the aftermath of the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant explosion and subsequent nuclear radiation leak. It targets residents around the power plant and those living in Fukushima prefecture as a whole.

According to media coverage, discriminatory incidents have taken place against children evacuated from the NPP-affected area to other neighboring prefectures. The children in the local community made fun of them saying, “Keep a distance from us. We don’t want to be infected.” In other prefectures, people evacuated from Fukushima have been asked to show certificates proving they are not affected by radiation. At a highway service area, drivers with Fukushima license plates encountered this attitude: “Shut out Fukushima cars.”

Many other incidents followed: “The landlord was very reluctant to rent us an apartment,” and “I was asked to show a radiation certificate at the reception of a welfare facility and hospital.”

These constitute the apparent prejudice relating to the NPP explosion, and demonstrate overt exclusion of the affected people.

In 100 days, a very short period of time since the earthquake, a new form of discrimination is being shaped. We cannot refrain from expressing our resentment and anger regarding this. 

While the disaster has brought huge destruction, it is not what produces new forms of discrimination. The explosion of the NPP has caused the serious leakage of radiation, but it is not what generates discrimination. The discrimination is being generated by human beings. 

All of us clearly remember that the A-bomb victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki suffer strong anxiety regarding their health, livelihoods and the prejudice against them for the past several decades. We should not make the same mistake in the midst of radiation leakage from the Fukushima NPP explosion. 

We sincerely make this call: Do not allow the opportunity for a new form of discrimination against Fukushima to emerge. To administrative agencies, educational institutions and the mass media, let’s create a public opinion that will not allow the expansion of discrimination.

   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>E-CONNECT No.7 Issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/subnews/econnect_no7_issued/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1085</id>
   
   <published>2011-06-09T03:30:03Z</published>
   <updated>2011-06-27T03:33:47Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="SubNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>One Year After the CERD Recommendations to Japan</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/erd/one_year_after_the_cerd_recomm/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1074</id>
   
   <published>2011-06-03T03:22:53Z</published>
   <updated>2011-06-03T03:27:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="01)Combating racial discrimination in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[After its consideration of the periodic reports of the Japanese Government in February 2010, the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) has issued its concluding observations, including many concerns and recommendations. One recommendation requested the Government to provide the Committee with  follow-up information on three recommendations, namely paragraphs 12, 20 and 21 regarding the establishment of a national human rights institution, which Japan has not yet done, the observance of the rights of the Ainu as indigenous peoples prescribed in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and engagement in a wide-range of consultations with Okinawan representatives to promote their rights and monitor discrimination against them. 

One year later, in March this year, the Government submitted follow-up information in the form of a “comment.” The information provided by the Government does not satisfy us as it is not relevant to what the Committee has asked them to provide. 

The NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Japan, or ERD Net (office based in IMADR), has sent its own follow-up information to the Committee.  Here, we share the information of ERD Net regarding the Ainu and Okinawa, as prepared by <I>Makiko Kimura</I> of the Shimin Gaikou Centre (Citizens' Diplomatic Centre for the Rights of Indigenous Peoples), a members of the network. 

<B>Recommendations in Para 20 regarding the Ainu as Indigenous People</B>

<B>CERD recommendation</B>: “Further steps be taken in conjunction with Ainu representatives to translate consultations into policies and programmes with clear and targeted action plans that address Ainu rights and that the participation of Ainu representatives in consultations be increased.”

<B>Present situation</B> 
While the Meeting for the Promotion of Ainu Policies  stresses that it refers to the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, it has not clearly indicated which paragraphs of the Declaration are taken into considerations, and how these are reflected in their work. Looking into the substantial work of the Meeting, we have not found any essential parts of the Declaration that have beenbeing reflected in its work. Now, the two working groups are have almost reached their own conclusion, however, it is hard to say that the Meeting takes into consideration the various voices of the Ainu living in and out of Hokkaido in their promotion work, and its transparency and representation is still questionable.

We recommend that <I>the Meeting for the Promotion of Ainu Policies or future successive agency of the Meeting has a structure in place to reflect the various voices of the Ainu and allows the Ainu to take their own initiatives in the work of the Meeting.</I>

<B>CERD recommendation</B>: The State party, in consultation with Ainu representatives, consider the establishment of a third working group with the purpose of examining and implementing international commitments such as the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 

<B>Present situation:</B> 
The Japanese Government has concentrated on the implementation of the work assigned to the two working groups, and not given any attention at all to setting up a third working group.

We recommend that <I>the Meeting for the Promotion of Ainu Policies examine the establishment of a third working group, or that the agency that succeeds it establish a working group with the purpose of examining and implementing the international commitments that the Government has made.</I>

<B>CERD recommendation</B>: It urges the State party to carry out a national survey of living conditions of Ainu in Hokkaido and recommends that the State party take into account the Committee’s general recommendation No. 23 (1997). 

<B>Present situation: </B>
A survey on Ainu peoples in Hokkaido has been made only by the local government of Hokkaido and the University of Hokkaido. The survey under the working group limits its scope only on those who live outside Hokkaido. Also, the 2010 national census did not have any questions regarding indigenous peoples or ethnic minorities. 

We recommend that <I>the Government include questions regarding indigenous peoples and ethnic minorities in the national census, and conduct a national survey regarding the Ainu peoples living in and out of Hokkaido in a systematic way.</I>

<B>CERD recommendation</B>: the State party consider ratifying the International Labour Organization Convention No. 169 (1989) concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries.

<B>Present situation:</B>
 The government answers in its comments that it is not in a position to ratify the Convention for the reasons that the provisions in Article 9 and 10 need to be examined from the viewpoint of consistency with the penal system of Japan.

We recommend that <I>the Government list up all provisions contained in the Constitution, laws and systems that are not consistent with the provisions contained in ILO No. 169, and study how such provisions could be revised so that Japan ratifies ILO Convention No. 169. In doing so, it is recommended that the government conduct a consultation with the Ainu Peoples and Ryukyu/Okinawa Peoples to examine which provisions of the ILO Convention need to be implemented. It is very unrealistic that the Ainu and Ryukyu/Okinawa Peoples request the implementation of Article 9 and 10.</I> 
 
<B>Recommendations in Para 21 regarding the Okinawans as Indigenous People</B>

<B>CERD’s concern</B>: While highlighting that UNESCO has recognized a number of Ryukyu languages (2009), as well as the Okinawans’ unique ethnicity, history, culture and traditions, the Committee regrets the approach of the State party to accord due recognition to the distinctness of Okinawa and expresses its concern about the persistent discrimination suffered by the people of Okinawa.

<B>Present situation:</B>
 The Japanese Government has continued to disregard the assertion that Okinawan people are indigenous peoples. This has caused the continuing violation of their rights up until now. Among others, the construction projects for the new military base in the Henoko Coast and Oura Bay areas, as well as the helipad in Takae, are intensifying the imbalanced concentration of US military facilities in Okinawa, while reinforcing the contemporary form of structural discrimination. Yet, the government has taken no specific and effective measure to implement the CERD recommendation to recognize Okinawa as having inherent rights and a unique ethnicity based on the recognition of the historical discrimination that Okinawa has remained subject to.

We recommend that <I>the Japanese Government recognize Okinawans as indigenous peoples with a unique history, culture and language.</I>

<B>CERD recommendation</B>: The Committee encourages the State party to engage in wide consultations with Okinawan representatives with a view to monitoring discrimination suffered by Okinawans, in order to promote their rights and establish appropriate protection measures and policies.

<B>Present Situation:</B>
 In its follow-up information submitted to CERD, the government limited itself to explaining only about its Okinawa promotion measures in the legal and institutional framework, which, according to their explanation, are based on the intentions and interests of the Okinawa prefectural government. CERD, however, encourages a wide range of consultations with Okinawan representatives. It is inadequate and insufficient to guarantee the human rights of the Okinawan people only by responding to what the Okinawa prefectural and municipal governments have requested.  

We recommend that <I>in addressing the structural discrimination against the people of Okinawa, the Japanese Government guarantee the rights of the Okinawan people in the context of ICERD. </I>

<a href="http://www.imadr.org/un/at%20the%20unsmall.jpg"><img alt="at%20the%20unsmall.jpg" src="http://www.imadr.org/un/at%20the%20unsmall-thumb.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></a>
(prepared by the Shimin Gaikou Centre (Citizens Diplomacy Centre))

For “comments” prepared by the Government, click <a href="http://www.imadr.org/un/government%20follow-up%20%28UN%29.pdf">here.</a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>E-CONNECT No.6 issued</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/subnews/post_10/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1073</id>
   
   <published>2011-06-03T01:45:40Z</published>
   <updated>2011-06-08T08:20:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="SubNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Unprecedented Disaster Hits Eastern Japan</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/erd/unprecedented_disaster_hits_ea/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1071</id>
   
   <published>2011-06-02T10:01:25Z</published>
   <updated>2011-11-28T07:57:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="01)Combating racial discrimination in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[<B>Rubble Spreading Out Before Us</B>

While standing at a crossroad in Rikuzen-Takada City, one of the towns most affected by the tsunami on March 11, 2011, I heard somebody groaning from behind me. I turned around but found nothing but the expansive landscape of stacks of rubble, without a single person around. I may have imagined the voice in my head. Some hundreds or thousands of people are still under this rubble. The streets of Rikuzen-Takada indeed turned into a mountain of rubble. I had been here once, many years ago, and still have memories of the beautiful harbor town. Most of the city’s damage was brought by the<I> tsunami</I>. Those houses standing on the hill and not affected by it have remained safe, and the people residing there continue to live there as they had before. The earthquake alone did not cause serious damage to most of the buildings in the area, but the big <I>tsunami</I> that followed washed out everything. A distance of a few meters determined the safety of the buildings. 

Being in the affected area, I found two things that I have never thought about before when watching the news on TV. One is the smell: When houses are washed away, lavatories, kerosene heaters and other things are also washed away, naturally creating a smell of all these things mixed together. The other thing I discovered is that many houses/cars carried away into the sea are still there. Looking at the sea, I can easily spot many cars that are still sinking. The people who were driving them may still be in them. In some parts, clearing of the rubble is already starting, and bodies are being found everyday. When I talked to one member of the self-defense force carrying out rescue operations, he said, “It is most painful to find the dead body of a small school child carrying a satchel on his/her back.” 

<B>The Mountain of Relief Goods and Loss of Delivery Functions</B>

In storage facilities, relief goods sent from around the country are piled up high. Each is the same, with a huge amount of food, clothes, commodities and blankets. Yet the people in the shelter we visited all complained about the shortage of food or unavailability of what they really needed. This is probably due to the absence of good communication. Since communication tools are pretty much down, including telephone lines and the Internet, town halls are not functioning. This is a lesson for us that being well prepared is the key to dealing with a crisis. 

To ask for the acceptance of our relief goods, I negotiated with officials of the prefectural government and municipal governments, but they could not make an immediate decision. “I will respond to you later,” or “I need to consult with my boss” were their common responses.  “You see, now is not the time to say that,” I replied  in frustration. Faced by the crisis, they could not make decisions out of fear of criticism. Thus, things takes time, and do not move forward. This is not a good culture.

Yet, the people on the frontline are working very hard and doing their best. Officials of Ofunato City stay overnight in the city hall despite the fact that they themselves are victims. Employees of municipal offices and medical personnel are indeed struggling to carry out their huge workloads with small teams. 

<B>Reconstruction is Not Easy</B>

At any rate, the nuclear power plant is a tricky issue. While a county with the cruel experiences of atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan has underestimated the horrors of nuclear energy getting out of control. The contaminated cooling water was dumped into the sea, which then contaminated the ocean. If the reactor is not cooled, it may cause a catastrophe. And yet there is no more room to dump the contaminated water. In this paradox, the crisis has continued. Even we can evade the worst scenario, it may take a considerably long period of time for the pheripheral areas around the Fukushima plant to become free from radioactive contamination.  What will happen to the agricultural and fishery industries? The shortage of electric power will inevitably impact industrial activities. The economy will continue to be stagnant or become worse, affecting employment. It is a fear that many of the small subcontractors or local industries in the disaster-stricken areas will be driven into bankruptcy due to unavoidable stops in operation, bringing about a large number of workers being laid off. Without a great deal of preparedness and good planning, it is impossible to overcome this catastrophic situation.

People are patient and determined as they continue their struggles. A junior high teacher told us, “Even if we cannot use the school buildings, we will start the new school year on April 8.” When we were in Ofunato, a high school was announcing entrance exam results although it was right after the disaster. This indicates their strong will to not be discouraged by the disaster. However, some of those students who are successful in the examination had lost their house, and even their parents. I am very anxious about how they will cope with this situation and what will happen on them. 

One elderly woman who opened the door of her house to us when we dropped by cheerfully said, “I am doing volunteer activities with people who come from abroad.” People are not necessarily staying in the shelter as victims who are weak. I also brought some <I>sake</I> (rice wine) to the affected areas. In fact, my colleagues tried to stop me from bringing it, saying, “You will be frowned upon.” At the shelter, I asked some people in a small voice, “Would you like to have <I>sake</I>? I have it with me.” They were all pleased and welcomed this unexpected gift. 

<B>Bringing Hope to the Affected People</B>

What will happen on the evacuees? For the time being, they are being accommodated in the shelter, but it is not likely that they will continue to stay in the gymnasium for long. If they are accommodated in temporary housing, they will need to buy furniture, heaters, kitchen utensils, etc., but, they do not have money. They will need refrigerators and other appliances. I wonder if the governemnt will give financial aid to these people. 

In the disaster stricken areas, people continue to face many difficulties. It is not only a matter of shortages in food, medicine, medical treatment or clothes. It is a matter affecting their entire lives. 

Under these circumstances, what can the Buraku Liberation League do? At moment, we do whatever we can. We can send donation and relief goods. We can send volunteers to the areas. In response to the call for relief by the BLL, many members have sent relief goods. We all remain sympathetic to the victims and the vulnerable. We will not give up this spirit. 

<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/photo%20kataokasmall.jpg"><img alt="photo%20kataokasmall.jpg" src="http://www.imadr.org/multi/photo%20kataokasmall-thumb.jpg" width="300" height="199" /></a>

<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/in%20the%20worldsmall.jpg"><img alt="in%20the%20worldsmall.jpg" src="http://www.imadr.org/multi/in%20the%20worldsmall-thumb.jpg" width="300" height="199" /></a>
Volunteers helping distribution of relief goods.

(Report by Akiyuki Kataoka
Central Executive Committee of Buraku Liberation League)


]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Dalit Women United! - Nepal</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/mw/dalit_women_united_nepal/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1070</id>
   
   <published>2011-06-02T09:38:27Z</published>
   <updated>2011-06-02T09:59:22Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="02)Multiple discrimination against minority women in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[Feminist Dalit Organization (FEDO) organized the <B>National Conference of Dalit Women</B> with the theme <I>“Dignified life, Inclusion and Social Transformation”</I> from May 11-13, 2011. Over the three- day- long conference held in Kathmandu, Dalit women activists from 75 districts of Nepal, human rights activists, representatives from different international and domestic NGOs, media personnel; and international delegates from Denmark, UK, Sweden, Hongkong, India, and Bangladesh, participated. 
A huge rally was organized, marching through different parts of the town chanting various slogans related to Dalit women’s rights and the upcoming new constitution. It took place early in the morning at 8:30 am, and more than 800 activists participated. The rally began from Bhadrakali and concluded at City Hall, Kathmandu. The Dalit women activists, along with various like-minded organizations from all over the country, also joined for solidarity regarding the objectives of the conference and for Dalit women’s issues.  
After the rally, the participants were taken to a conference hall after the registration. Opening the conference, FEDO President Durga Sob gave welcome remarks highlighting the conference objectives and its background where she put forward the issues of Dalit women. The conference formally began with an inauguration by the Chief Guest Subash Chandra Nemwang, Chairperson of Constitution Assembly. Earlier, FEDO president Durga Sob chaired the conference and other guests took their respective seats. The Minister for Local Development, leaders of political parties, the UNDP Nepal Resident Coordinator, civil society leaders and international delegates were among the special guests.
Following the inauguration session, special guests gave their remarks and congratulated FEDO for organizing such a conference that would support to assertions of the rights of Dalit women.  Saradha Pokharel, Chairperson of Security Pressure Group, extended her best wishes to the organizer for being able to create pressure to incorporate the agendas of Dailt women in the upcoming new constitution and for making the conference a huge success. The chief guest Nemwang said that the conclusion and recommendation of the conference would be fruitful for the constitution-making process, especially in addressing the agendas and issues of Dalit women. “The constitution-making process is really challenging, but we can turn this as an opportunity to favor the marginalized, disadvantaged groups and bring their issues into the mainstream,” Nemwang added.
Urmila Aryal, Minister for Local Development, stated that the recommendations from the conference are very important and that said she would do her best to address them. Similarly, Rikke Nohrlind, Coordinator at the International Dalit Solidarity Network (IDSN), expressed that the conference would be a milestone to pressurize for the participation of Dalit women in the decision-making level and state-restructuring process. Professor Vimal Thorat, from India, stressed that the leadership, representation and reservation for Dalit women will ensure their rights. Dr. Ruth Momorama, a human rights activist from India, expressed that Dalit women and other marginalized and disadvantaged women need to be united so that the voice of voiceless can be heard.  At the same time, three political parties’ leaders also expressed their best wishes for bringing out the strong recommendations and gave their commitment to raising the issues of Dalit women in the new constitution. 
In between the remarks sessions, Anuradha Koirala, President of Maiti Nepal and 2010 CNN Hero of the year, was honored by the chief guest and FEDO President for her contribution in the social sector, especially for working constantly with the issue of trafficking of girls in Nepal. 
After the inaugural session, working papers on various themes were presented. 
On Day one, two papers were presented and brought to the discussion among the participants, and comment was made by the commentator which was facilitated by the chair assigned for the paper. Following are the details of paper presentation on the<B> first day:</B> 
<B>1.</B>
Topic:       "Constituent Assembly and State Restructuring and Issues of Dalit women”
Presenter: Bishwo Bhakta Dulal (Ahuti) (CA Member)
Chair by:   Dr. Surya Dhungel (Constitution expert)
Commentator:  Sapana Malla Pradhan (CA Member), Yam Bahadur Kisan (Advocate)
<B>2.</B>
Topic:       “Madhesi Dalit women and their problems”
Presenter:   Ganga Mahara (Activist)
Chaired by:  Sarita Giri (CA Member)
Commentator: Ranju Thakur (Advocate), Shanti Devi Paswan (Activist)
After each presentation, there was intense discussion on the theme of the paper by women from the districts, and they expressed their opinions, views and feedback.
  
<B>Second day</B> 
On Day Two, the remaining papers were presented. 
<B>3.</B>
Topic:        “Badi women and their problems”
Chaired by:  Dr. Renu Rajbhandari (Activists)
Presenter:    Uma Badi (Dalit Activist)
Commentator:    Binod Pahadi (CA Member), Dhana Kumari Sunar (NWC Member)
<B>4.</B>
Topic:          Sharing international experience 
Panalists:     Rikke Nohrlind, Coordinator, IDSN; Dr. Ruth Manorama, India; Ms. Moni Rani,
                   Bangladesh; Cintia Lavendera, Program Manager, WOMANKIND Worldwide, UK)
Chaired by:  Dr. Sumitra Mamandhar Gurung
<B>5.</B> 
Topic:         “Issues of Far western Dalit Women”
Chaired by:    Dr. Arju Deuba Rana (CA Member)
Presenter:     Ganesh BK (Political/Social Activist)
Commentator:  Hari Ram Sripailee (CA Member), Gyanu Gaire (NDC Member)
<B>6.</B> 
Topic:            “Impact of Inter-caste marriage on Dalit women”
Chaired by:       Teku Nepali (Politician)
Presenter:         Sabita Singh (Women Activist)
Commentator:   Ambika Gajmer (Women activist), Kamala Hemchuri (Activist)
The paper presentation was followed by a cultural program to refresh the participants, and was performed by the Kritika Group (a group of disabled, marginalized, minority women). They performed various dances and songs reflecting the issues of marginalized women. The cultural program was highly entertaining, with most of the participants dancing and singing with the performers. This program was able to convey a strong message that there is a need for women’s solidarity to acquire various rights. In conclusion, they performed a drama that portrayed a story of women affected by domestic violence, rape, witch accusations, disability, issues as single women, discrimination and untouchability. 

<B>Third Day</B> 
The third and last day began with a group discussion. Women participants were divided into groups according to five development regions, with women from the districts discussing the major issues confronting Dalit women from that region. Later on, the conclusions from each discussion were shared. After the tea break, Cintia Lavandera, Programme Manager of WOMANKIND Worldwide, shared the experience of international agencies working on the issues of Dalit women in Nepal and showed her commitment to contribute to the rights and empowerment of Dalit women. 
In the second session of the last day, the FEDO General Secretary presented a memorandum to the group that was to be submitted to the CA Chairperson, Prime Minister after being finalized. In the memorandum, different provisions were included on various issues affecting Dalit women, including political, economic, socio-cultural, education, health and legal agendas. In this regards, an open discussion was held where participants brought out very significant points to be included so as to incorporate the rights of Dalit women into the new constitution. At the end of the session, Durga Sob thanked all the people who gave support to make the conference successful and officially closed the conference.
Overall, the conference went well and the whole event was covered by different television and radio channels, newspapers and magazines. The first day was broadcasted live by a radio station where the reporter talked with participants from the districts and the team that organized the conference.
<a href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/its%20concern.JPG"><img alt="its%20concern.JPG" src="http://www.imadr.org/multi/its%20concern-thumb.JPG" width="300" height="199" /></a>

(Reported by FEDO)
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>International Day against Racial Discrimination Celebrated in Nepal</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/mw/international_day_against_raci/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1060</id>
   
   <published>2011-04-22T10:16:17Z</published>
   <updated>2011-06-02T06:55:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="02)Multiple discrimination against minority women in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12" label="CategoryNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10" label="ThemeNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      On March 21, 1960, 69 black people were killed by the police at a peaceful demonstration in Sharpeville, South Africa, held to protest the apartheid &quot;pass laws.&quot; In 1966, the United Nations decided to mark this day officially. Since then, on March 21, people around the world celebrate the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

The Feminist Dalit Organization (FEDO) did not fail to celebrate the 46th International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. On this occasion, FEDO wanted to remind everyone about caste discrimination in Nepal, especially against Dalit people. Being born in a Dalit community continues to mean a life of stigmatization, poverty and exclusion for millions in the country, despite Nepal being a signatory of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. 

One more reason to take part in programs on this day was the upcoming Constitution. In fact, Nepal is waiting for the proclamation of its Constitution on May 28. It is thus a decisive and opportune moment to put pressure on the government through such events, to ensure the inclusion of Dalits&apos; rights in the new Constitution.

In practical terms, a rally for Dalit rights in the streets of Kathmandu kicked off this International Day to highlight caste discrimination. Five hundred people left from Bhadrakali and went through the main streets of central Kathmandu. Political parties and various organizations participated in the rally with banners and slogans. Together, they urged that Dalit rights be included in the next Constitution. FEDO played a significant role in the rally by bringing together Dalit women from different women&apos;s groups from the Lalitpur and Kathmandu districts.

For the other part of the day, a program was organized by the National Dalit Commission. To begin the program, all those gathered were invited to observe one minute of silence in memory of the massacre of 1960. Representatives of various organizations, political parties and the Constituent Assembly then delivered speeches one by one. Every speaker urged all those concerned to abolish laws and practices that promote racial discrimination and to fight against caste-based discrimination. 

As regards to FEDO, President Durga Sob reminded listeners of the non-presence of colorful discrimination in Nepal, but of caste discrimination. She drew attention to the essential need for unity in the Dalit community to reach our goals. A Dalit member of the Constituent Assembly, Subash Chandra Nembang, added that this caste discrimination should be eliminated in the upcoming Constitution. He made a commitment to address the important agenda of the Dalit community in the Constitutional Assembly. Furthermore, he said that caste-based discrimination is an inhuman act we should abolish not only on paper, but in practice as well.

The significant presence of the media at this program was a positive point towards spreading our message of equality and a just society to mainstream Nepali society.
(Report by Feminist Dalit Organization (FEDO))
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Asian Rural Women’s Coalition (ARWC) Calls for the Decommissioning of Fukushima NPP</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.imadr.org/multi/mw/asian_rural_womens_coalition_a/" />
   <id>tag:www.imadr.org,2011:/multi//30.1058</id>
   
   <published>2011-04-22T09:52:00Z</published>
   <updated>2011-06-02T06:56:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name></name>
      
   </author>
         <category term="02)Multiple discrimination against minority women in Japan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12" label="CategoryNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10" label="ThemeNews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="ja" xml:base="http://www.imadr.org/multi/">
      
      <![CDATA[During the international conference held by the Asian Rural Women’s Coalition (AWRC) in Chennai, India, to mark the 100th anniversary of Women’s Resistance, the following urgent call was adopted by the Conference on March 30, 2011.  The full text is reproduced below.

<b>Decommission the Fukushima nuclear plants and nuclear plans all over the world</b>

The tragic events caused by the earthquakes and tsunami that hit the eastern part of Japan have raised international solidarity. The nuclear crisis at the Fukushima plants is apparently not under control and continues to be a radiation threat. We are concerned about the people who have been exposed to the radiation in engaging in the operations to suppress the reactors, as well as the people who may have to shoulder the consequences of radiation exposure.  

Nuclear power has been promoted under the false assumption that it is a safe and clean alternative energy source to fossil fuel in the climate change talks. In Asia, various countries have expressed their interest in building nuclear plants, including Thailand, Indonesia, Burma, the Philippines and India. In India, the nuclear power plants were planned to be built in Jaitapur, which has been raising strong concerns and protest among the local people. The Philippines has built a nuclear power plant in Bataan. 

This is an issue of central-peripheral, rural-urban disparity in development policy. Hazardous establishments such as nuclear power plants are built in rural areas or the outskirts of capital cities, putting the risks and expenses on the lives of people in those areas. The power generated by the nuclear plants is used to promote industrial and economic growth, the materialistic lifestyle of some people and the hegemonic power in the world, which has been maintained at the expense of people in rural areas.

Policy-making and employment in those industries are male-dominated, which widen the gaps in economic capacity and autonomy between women and men and strengthen the patriarchal system in society.  Budget cuts in and privatization of social services, which have been pursued under the global economic framework, make women in rural areas vulnerable particularly in the crisis situations such as natural disasters, disease outbreaks and exposure to pollution. Women’s reproductive health, particularly regarding pregnant women, fetuses and children, is the most affected, as experienced in Chernobyl. Communities who protest the nuclear plants at the local area are also vulnerable to attacks, displacement and dislocation.

We, the Asian Rural Women’s Coalition (ARWC), gathering in Chennai to commemorate the 100th International Women’s Day, express our support for the people in Japan and Jaitapur in protesting the nuclear plants. We urge the government of Japan to decommission all nuclear plants in Fukushima and across Japan. We urge the government of India to give up the plan to build the nuclear plants in Jaitapur. We urge the government of the Philippines to junk the efforts to revive the Bataan nuclear power plant. We urge all countries that have existing nuclear plants or have plans to operate to decommission and stop supporting these plans, as these would expose us to unnecessary risks and potentially horrendous consequences. The ARWC calls on governments to expand its radiation monitoring, immediately mobilize resources, and implement precautionary measures to prevent or at least mitigate the potential effects of radioactive contamination. 

The ARWC, at the same time, rejects the equally destructive agro-fuel production and monocropping for energy, which have serious impacts on the local communities, health and the environment. The ARWC reiterates the need to build sustainable, safe and appropriate sources of energy. 

We call on the international community to promote less consumption of energy, particularly by the industrial countries.]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

